41 sq mile ice sheet breaks free; global warming in region likely to blame say scientists:
news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061...c_ice_break
news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061...c_ice_break
-
Re: Ice mass snaps free from Canada's Arctic
Mon, January 1, 2007 - 12:24 AMThis is the start of things to come I'm afraid to say...
-
Re: Ice mass snaps free from Canada's Arctic
Tue, January 2, 2007 - 9:55 PMit's interesting to me that it actually happened a while ago.
<snip>
Laurie Weir, who monitors ice conditions for the Canadian Ice Service, was poring over satellite images in 2005 when she noticed that the shelf had split and separated.
Weir notified Luke Copland, head of the new global ice lab at the University of Ottawa, who initiated an effort to find out what happened.
Using U.S. and Canadian satellite images, as well as seismic data — the event registered on earthquake monitors 155 miles away — Copland discovered that the ice shelf collapsed in the early afternoon of Aug. 13, 2005. -
-
Re: Ice mass snaps free from Canada's Arctic
Sun, February 4, 2007 - 7:10 PMWhile I wouldn't go all Chicken Little based on any one ice shelf separating, keep in mind that the _greatest_ danger is posed by a LAND-based ice mass sliding into the sea. The reason why is that when the ice falls from land to water, it will immediately increase sea levels, even while the ice is still in solid form; and of course, surrounded by water (which is by definition above the freezing point), it won't stay ice long. -
-
Re: Ice mass snaps free from Canada's Arctic
Mon, February 5, 2007 - 8:44 PMRight, one ice shelf is not a global disaster. However it may not melt all that fast because it is mostly fresh water ice and the sea can be below the freezing point since the sea is salt and can get below the fresh water freezing poiunt and still be liquid.
-
-
-
Re: Ice mass snaps free from Canada's Arctic
Mon, February 5, 2007 - 8:35 PMYes, i believe Jordan is right on point, a little like water displacement at first, but then as he suggests, the mass melt off.